Skip to main content

John, age 12, is abducted by his father, who is divorcing his mother and believes the court will not grant him visitation.  John’s father takes him from Boston to Los Angeles.  For the next four years John and his father have absolutely no contact with John’s mother.  When John turns 16, he goes to the Department of Motor Vehicles to get his driver’s license.  The DMV scans his fingerprint, which is entered into the DMV’s database.  From there, it is automatically sent tot the California Crime Information Center and the Nation Crime Information Center.  The fingerprint matches the record of a missing child in Boston, and John is reunited with his mother.

Sara, age 14, runs away from her home in Dallas.  She has been gone for six months and is forced to turn to shoplifting to continue her flight.  Her crimes are not large – a loaf of bread here, a carton of milk there – but eventually she is caught and fingerprinted in Tucson, AZ.  When her fingerprints are sent to the National Crime Information Center, they show that Sarah is a runaway from Dallas.  The police are notified and Sarah is reunited with her parents.

Thirty years ago, this type of recovery scenario would not have been possible.  However, advances in technology, increased education, continued collaboration between law enforcement agencies and an ever-growing number of parents fingerprinting their children are helping to make a very real impact on law enforcement’s ability to locate a missing child.